Tuesday, October 5, 2010

Cooper and the Sexual Relations in the Epic

Many scholars have debated over the true nature of the relationship between Gilgamesh and Enkidu. Was it merely a very deeply rooted brotherly love or was did it contain the traits of a sexual affiliation? Historian J. S. Cooper claims that the evidence of the latter is undeniable. I believe that to truly answer this question we must take on a view of sexuality similar to that of the ancient Mesopotamians of the time. Homosexual tendencies were perceived differently in those days than modern day. Sexual relations between the same gender were not necessarily more common, but accepted with much less reservations. Men and women of power were more or less able to do what they pleased with those of lesser stature, and if that included having sexual relations, then so be it. In addition, sexual relations of all sorts were thought of as a way of linking body and soul. In the cases of Gilgamesh and Enkidu, this is taken to further level. The pair of friends share so many qualities in physical strength, appearance, power, and actions, and only proceed to become more and more alike as they share in experiences and battles. They are so inherently similar and share so many characteristics that it would be perfectly logical if they share bodies as well. As this would not have been viewed with surprise in the ancient culture, it stands to follow that this relationship would not necessarily have been emphasized in the Epic. However, if there was indeed a sexual link between the two equals, this sexual nature would not necessarily hold the same significance as a homosexual relationship has today. Instead of an emphasis on the physical love between two men, the relationship between Gilgamesh and Enkidu is focused on their inherent connection. They are created as counterparts, and therefore have many similarities that naturally draw them together. One could even go as far as to literally say that they were “made to be together”. If being together also entails a sexual bonding, then so be it.

No comments:

Post a Comment

Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.